Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-14 05:54:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 74AFC22567C26629453239A729146B9B77E04CCE98F636203A4A98C0CEC53F4A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass report mentions waiting lists 29 times: "The length of the waiting list to access gender services has significant implications for this population." (p 21) "unmanageably long waiting lists." (p 37) "waiting list for specialist services in excess of 2 years" (p 77) https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790141559033479656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 74AFC22567C26629453239A729146B9B77E04CCE98F636203A4A98C0CEC53F4A
  • createdAtMillis - 1715666072095
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179014155903347965674AFC22567C26629453239A729146B9B77E04CCE98F636203A4A98C0CEC53F4A