Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-14 05:31:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3AC2E800E1392BE78B1F9616E71900C7444D8E8861B6B328B476F525BA8D7886
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass report mentions waiting lists 29 times: "The length of the waiting list to access gender services has significant implications for this population." (p 21) "unmanageably long waiting lists." (p 37) "waiting list for specialist services in excess of 2 years" (p 77) https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790141559033479656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3AC2E800E1392BE78B1F9616E71900C7444D8E8861B6B328B476F525BA8D7886
  • createdAtMillis - 1715664699743
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17901415590334796563AC2E800E1392BE78B1F9616E71900C7444D8E8861B6B328B476F525BA8D7886