Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-14 06:25:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1AA942C0F11C9634D51777A1623F29D9219E805FA01138AE7ACF14355BB7B20F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass report mentions waiting lists 29 times: "The length of the waiting list to access gender services has significant implications for this population." (p 21) "unmanageably long waiting lists." (p 37) "waiting list for specialist services in excess of 2 years" (p 77) https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790141559033479656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1AA942C0F11C9634D51777A1623F29D9219E805FA01138AE7ACF14355BB7B20F
  • createdAtMillis - 1715667933805
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17901415590334796561AA942C0F11C9634D51777A1623F29D9219E805FA01138AE7ACF14355BB7B20F