Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-14 02:16:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8875D055321D84FDB34ABFFBC0B888F7726FFC5ECB5D8E6E7E9E3874DABD6907
Participant Details

Original Note:

&hyphen-minus; It's not a leak, it's scraping of public data. - There is no evidence that it was set up as a "honeypot" to harvest data. - The European Union only financed the analysis. It's not involved with Duolicious. All this from the same link quoted in the tweet: https://archive.org/details/duolicious_analysis/mode/2up

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790084511629189611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8875D055321D84FDB34ABFFBC0B888F7726FFC5ECB5D8E6E7E9E3874DABD6907
  • createdAtMillis - 1715652972885
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17900845116291896118875D055321D84FDB34ABFFBC0B888F7726FFC5ECB5D8E6E7E9E3874DABD6907