Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-13 18:26:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 598C04DB46F2C34EC9CF982886432949466A63395C92B7C6EA828723664468E7
Participant Details

Original Note:

&hyphen-minus; It's not a leak, it's scraping of public data. - There is no evidence that it was set up as a "honeypot" to harvest data. - The European Union only financed the analysis. It's not involved with Duolicious. All this from the same link quoted in the tweet: https://archive.org/details/duolicious_analysis/mode/2up

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790084511629189611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 598C04DB46F2C34EC9CF982886432949466A63395C92B7C6EA828723664468E7
  • createdAtMillis - 1715624797788
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1790084511629189611598C04DB46F2C34EC9CF982886432949466A63395C92B7C6EA828723664468E7