Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-13 15:25:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A21886F54D4391C9301F23F72309DB802FD00E84C9E63B5F1D0B28355B9BF529
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP clearly expresses an opinion on why he views the argument provided as a bad take, there is nothing factual. Even if the main note provides context there isn't any added value to this post. Provide the note on the original post of reformeddiary where it's more relevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789981324415062170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A21886F54D4391C9301F23F72309DB802FD00E84C9E63B5F1D0B28355B9BF529
  • createdAtMillis - 1715613905728
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1789981324415062170A21886F54D4391C9301F23F72309DB802FD00E84C9E63B5F1D0B28355B9BF529