Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-13 11:52:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B059964AF456F859BFAD48A87C1EEF9CC911FA9194A6F678A824007349DF5A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP clearly expresses an opinion on why he views the argument provided as a bad take, there is nothing factual. Even if the main note provides context there isn't any added value to this post. Provide the note on the original post of reformeddiary where it's more relevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789981324415062170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B059964AF456F859BFAD48A87C1EEF9CC911FA9194A6F678A824007349DF5A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1715601138679
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17899813244150621708B059964AF456F859BFAD48A87C1EEF9CC911FA9194A6F678A824007349DF5A9