Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-13 12:58:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E64CEF408C71C78D20517A2C13E8B12489EDF23A5F3660130892A2CC154EA348
Participant Details

Original Note:

Like much of the content posted by this account, this post is entirely false. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N37Y2IE/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789956938265993307
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E64CEF408C71C78D20517A2C13E8B12489EDF23A5F3660130892A2CC154EA348
  • createdAtMillis - 1715605110449
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1789956938265993307E64CEF408C71C78D20517A2C13E8B12489EDF23A5F3660130892A2CC154EA348