Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-13 10:02:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 715351CE05057E81AE4D7ABD8D3993DC0D22D32784F39D7A8FCF5E3DF1519FA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Like much of the content posted by this account, this post is entirely false. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N37Y2IE/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789956938265993307
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 715351CE05057E81AE4D7ABD8D3993DC0D22D32784F39D7A8FCF5E3DF1519FA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1715594551052
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1789956938265993307715351CE05057E81AE4D7ABD8D3993DC0D22D32784F39D7A8FCF5E3DF1519FA0