Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-13 10:10:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 37F49E74063FB599872B418BA9570290385BD0D891295C001F0EE486E46AC310
Participant Details

Original Note:

Like much of the content posted by this account, this post is entirely false. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N37Y2IE/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789956938265993307
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 37F49E74063FB599872B418BA9570290385BD0D891295C001F0EE486E46AC310
  • createdAtMillis - 1715595026227
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178995693826599330737F49E74063FB599872B418BA9570290385BD0D891295C001F0EE486E46AC310