Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-13 08:47:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A8C798CB4DE312645CA9EE4BF4BA1A026DEB3A8F1C9C2DDE55925B3A75CFE14C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case was civil. The officer was legally justified in using deadly force. He was found liable for damages but not criminally. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-4th-circuit/2167519.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789840372295925985
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A8C798CB4DE312645CA9EE4BF4BA1A026DEB3A8F1C9C2DDE55925B3A75CFE14C
  • createdAtMillis - 1715590033380
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1789840372295925985A8C798CB4DE312645CA9EE4BF4BA1A026DEB3A8F1C9C2DDE55925B3A75CFE14C