Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-12 17:43:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C481BF7ADA50465DDA8FDA0AEFCD8575749981BEE0832E8F8D4060A868807B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's not that easy to say the legality of the screen, and because it's ultimately a judgement call. The two facts here are that the refs said it was legal, and the poster thinks it wasn't, both of which are being conveyed in the post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789556654096142366
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C481BF7ADA50465DDA8FDA0AEFCD8575749981BEE0832E8F8D4060A868807B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1715535804871
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17895566540961423662C481BF7ADA50465DDA8FDA0AEFCD8575749981BEE0832E8F8D4060A868807B2