Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-11 22:19:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1299732836B66B15983E965B70C1A0040FA1CF33416EB1C9A1F62CBA431E9116
Participant Details

Original Note:

1st it was not the ICC *International criminal court but the ICJ International Court of justice 2nd the declarations mentioned in the post has been done , highly irritual, after she left its seat as President of ICJ and do not represent Court-s view or Court reasoning https://www.icj-cij.org/index.php/node/4088 https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789411389775159388
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1299732836B66B15983E965B70C1A0040FA1CF33416EB1C9A1F62CBA431E9116
  • createdAtMillis - 1715465978785
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17894113897751593881299732836B66B15983E965B70C1A0040FA1CF33416EB1C9A1F62CBA431E9116