Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-11 19:36:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75FA329063FCB9343B48A8373CDD7B32C6EF6786D7CC92B07D071389D6B5CC9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post trompeur, complotiste. Pour comparer l'impact d'un Mitsubishi A6M à celui d'un Boeing 767: EC=0,5*m*v2 A6m EC max = 19 321 kj 767 EC max = 4 189 140 kj ll aurait fallu 210 A6M en même temps, au même point, pour obtenir le résultat d'un seul Boeing 767 sur les Twins https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_A6M https://www.techno-science.net/glossaire-definition/Boeing-767-page-2.html https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89nergie_cin%C3%A9tique

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789273104776093707
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75FA329063FCB9343B48A8373CDD7B32C6EF6786D7CC92B07D071389D6B5CC9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1715456170267
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178927310477609370775FA329063FCB9343B48A8373CDD7B32C6EF6786D7CC92B07D071389D6B5CC9A