Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-11 13:43:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6ADBD16FB20A8823CF3CE810B26EADE211A1C138B54AC910A768A779A5DF798F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post trompeur, complotiste. Pour comparer l'impact d'un Mitsubishi A6M à celui d'un Boeing 767: EC=0,5*m*v2 A6m EC max = 19 321 kj 767 EC max = 4 189 140 kj ll aurait fallu 210 A6M en même temps, au même point, pour obtenir le résultat d'un seul Boeing 767 sur les Twins https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_A6M https://www.techno-science.net/glossaire-definition/Boeing-767-page-2.html https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89nergie_cin%C3%A9tique

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789273104776093707
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6ADBD16FB20A8823CF3CE810B26EADE211A1C138B54AC910A768A779A5DF798F
  • createdAtMillis - 1715434993121
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17892731047760937076ADBD16FB20A8823CF3CE810B26EADE211A1C138B54AC910A768A779A5DF798F