Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-11 16:52:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B156FC3FB75C2CB1BA60D295D59F07A5D1B94FA13D08A9D72F354B436BF7EC7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post misleadingly claims Shell sold ‘phantom’ credits - except the FT article shows a clear correction stating: “This article has been amended since first publication to clarify that Shell itself did not sell any of the ‘phantom’ credits, as originally stated” https://www.ft.com/content/93938a1b-dc36-4ea6-9308-170189be0cb0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789270846361514216
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B156FC3FB75C2CB1BA60D295D59F07A5D1B94FA13D08A9D72F354B436BF7EC7D
  • createdAtMillis - 1715446371168
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1789270846361514216B156FC3FB75C2CB1BA60D295D59F07A5D1B94FA13D08A9D72F354B436BF7EC7D