Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-12 10:45:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9C4C484BEF016E513D03EC44684356C4315B7E62FA0ED1D6F7D03CBE8B5B9923
Participant Details

Original Note:

Les faits émises sont satiriques, un avion de ligne emagasine bien plus d'énergie cinétique, à cause de sa masse et de sa vitesse bien plus conséquente que un avion de 2nde guerre mondiale, plus légères Les deux structures visés possédant également des résistances différentes https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89nergie_cin%C3%A9tique

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1789258608909148398
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9C4C484BEF016E513D03EC44684356C4315B7E62FA0ED1D6F7D03CBE8B5B9923
createdAtMillis - 1715510756439
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17892586089091483989C4C484BEF016E513D03EC44684356C4315B7E62FA0ED1D6F7D03CBE8B5B9923