Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-11 20:02:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0B79ED4ECB68AF45E8C0DDB62FEE67415B335B27A3C7BACAAFD8DC48F7D3BAD
Participant Details

Original Note:

A jornalista inferiu por conta própria que houve desinformação. O estudo não teve essa conclusão. O estudo também não relaciona ou classifica as pessoas das postagens. Segundo pesquisadora da área: https://twitter.com/MichelePradoBa/status/1789065862273511521?t=qh3DXJ9Kc39mqWUsehC-jQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789066659031822746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0B79ED4ECB68AF45E8C0DDB62FEE67415B335B27A3C7BACAAFD8DC48F7D3BAD
  • createdAtMillis - 1715457769076
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1789066659031822746F0B79ED4ECB68AF45E8C0DDB62FEE67415B335B27A3C7BACAAFD8DC48F7D3BAD