Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-10 23:12:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D557D4A2EC7F6320568AB523939B3C7A7FBB1176C43A69DF2896B1F7CC24FAF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

A jornalista inferiu por conta própria que houve desinformação. O estudo não teve essa conclusão. O estudo também não relaciona ou classifica as pessoas das postagens. Segundo pesquisadora da área: https://twitter.com/MichelePradoBa/status/1789065862273511521?t=qh3DXJ9Kc39mqWUsehC-jQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789066659031822746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D557D4A2EC7F6320568AB523939B3C7A7FBB1176C43A69DF2896B1F7CC24FAF8
  • createdAtMillis - 1715382774730
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1789066659031822746D557D4A2EC7F6320568AB523939B3C7A7FBB1176C43A69DF2896B1F7CC24FAF8