Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-11 03:34:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AB7F0BEE955511CF3F3F0E9F48F0C481DC71F75A0A3ED52E1805761CF5092C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

A jornalista inferiu por conta própria que houve desinformação. O estudo não teve essa conclusão. O estudo também não relaciona ou classifica as pessoas das postagens. Segundo pesquisadora da área: https://twitter.com/MichelePradoBa/status/1789065862273511521?t=qh3DXJ9Kc39mqWUsehC-jQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1789066659031822746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AB7F0BEE955511CF3F3F0E9F48F0C481DC71F75A0A3ED52E1805761CF5092C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1715398489549
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17890666590318227466AB7F0BEE955511CF3F3F0E9F48F0C481DC71F75A0A3ED52E1805761CF5092C8