Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 08:19:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A970F1D94A2F50A282F567A14B0731F3F0E64C08062305A73EC661F06A33E062
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, it isn't. The claims made lack evidence of active, large-scale weather manipulation as implied. The patent outlines a theoretical framework for altering atmospheric conditions. It does not provide evidence of weather modification by the government. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/11/09/fact-check-no-patents-do-not-prove-weather-modification-real/10606592002/ https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.32XK3PR https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/01/25/fact-check-false-claim-severe-weather-linked-chemtrails-haarp/11084984002/ Patent 4686605: https://triangleip.com/us-patent-4686605-is-it-a-game-changer-for-geoengineering/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788989414917472572
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A970F1D94A2F50A282F567A14B0731F3F0E64C08062305A73EC661F06A33E062
  • createdAtMillis - 1728548373209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1788989414917472572A970F1D94A2F50A282F567A14B0731F3F0E64C08062305A73EC661F06A33E062