Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-10 14:59:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9AFAC0E6E2528FC25AFC1F0263DEC2B5CF9D7B9B385579AC2F965A8EC2B3100
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dans ses tweets précédents Manon Aubry ne parlait pas de "rémunérations annexes" mais de corruption (https://twitter.com/ManonAubryFr/status/1786389089664532944) et de députés "payés par les lobbys" (https://twitter.com/ManonAubryFr/status/1786389089664532944), accusations autrement plus graves et au caractère potentiellement diffamatoires

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1788907950855139495
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F9AFAC0E6E2528FC25AFC1F0263DEC2B5CF9D7B9B385579AC2F965A8EC2B3100
createdAtMillis - 1715353157839
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1788907950855139495F9AFAC0E6E2528FC25AFC1F0263DEC2B5CF9D7B9B385579AC2F965A8EC2B3100