Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-10 06:26:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BA87A070FC8356877AF5CD0477492D5052F71AF46306EEDE26B9462202F3145C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The revocation email is in fact genuine, and even comes from the same storefront mentioned by the (at this time of writing) top-rated proposed note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788814407926944060
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BA87A070FC8356877AF5CD0477492D5052F71AF46306EEDE26B9462202F3145C
  • createdAtMillis - 1715322409606
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788814407926944060BA87A070FC8356877AF5CD0477492D5052F71AF46306EEDE26B9462202F3145C