Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-17 18:12:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9A100727A935A0A1B3C3AFFF6CDDB43AD2ABF69AA6848C65882F9D109996E0CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note links to a UN definition of human rights. However, definitions such as this one is exactly the sort of idea this meme is attacking. The note merely asserts it is correct without contending with the idea that Kant's principle cannot be philosophically justified.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788646177824539094
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9A100727A935A0A1B3C3AFFF6CDDB43AD2ABF69AA6848C65882F9D109996E0CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1715969521423
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17886461778245390949A100727A935A0A1B3C3AFFF6CDDB43AD2ABF69AA6848C65882F9D109996E0CA