Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 20:50:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C60922CBE5FB963C48FB31D5A1BA32085758ECC0A5CA41CC2FBF34D1C2D2AC1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note links to a UN definition of human rights. However, definitions such as this one is exactly the sort of idea this meme is attacking. The note merely asserts it is correct without contending with the idea that Kant's principle cannot be philosophically justified.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788646177824539094
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C60922CBE5FB963C48FB31D5A1BA32085758ECC0A5CA41CC2FBF34D1C2D2AC1
  • createdAtMillis - 1715287814842
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17886461778245390944C60922CBE5FB963C48FB31D5A1BA32085758ECC0A5CA41CC2FBF34D1C2D2AC1