Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 20:44:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4788BE208CE15807F4AB985F5582EDCEB600B8818E3943A2A081A1AB16811FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dr Proudman is not facing disciplinary action for campaigning about the Garrick Club, but rather for tweets in which she criticised a judgment of Sir Jonathan Cohen in such a way as to "diminish the trust and confidence which the public places in her and in the profession". https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/mar/27/lawyer-boys-club-concerns-judgment-misconduct-case

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788642789514678508
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4788BE208CE15807F4AB985F5582EDCEB600B8818E3943A2A081A1AB16811FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1715287463567
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788642789514678508B4788BE208CE15807F4AB985F5582EDCEB600B8818E3943A2A081A1AB16811FA