Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-11 07:16:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6877C7F20E5D32F5887DBFDE2FE2FAA1EC9A803316931921133B4BBD954B2E30
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dr Proudman is not facing a professional disciplinary tribunal for “campaigning on” access to the Garrick Club but for a tweet thread she wrote attacking a judge and his judicial decision-making in which she used “old boys’ club attitudes” as a figure of speech https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/mar/27/lawyer-boys-club-concerns-judgment-misconduct-case

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788639324914770295
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6877C7F20E5D32F5887DBFDE2FE2FAA1EC9A803316931921133B4BBD954B2E30
  • createdAtMillis - 1715411808005
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17886393249147702956877C7F20E5D32F5887DBFDE2FE2FAA1EC9A803316931921133B4BBD954B2E30