Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-16 12:36:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C87096D87AAA88974F3E5F33BA1084E61CE65FBCC64D7AE7A8A04CCB9A3B48D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. None of the proposed CN's directly address the claim. Unless there is evidence that widespread voting by mail does NOT make "proving fraud almost impossible" (hint: most of the academic literature backs OP's assertion), then keep it in the comments. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788637860582785175
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C87096D87AAA88974F3E5F33BA1084E61CE65FBCC64D7AE7A8A04CCB9A3B48D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1715862968322
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788637860582785175C87096D87AAA88974F3E5F33BA1084E61CE65FBCC64D7AE7A8A04CCB9A3B48D0