Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 22:29:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 599FF88024806D7C453227392D01029C42ADE06F2B7CBAAE22D94E928F1F473C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN he's just listing a fact; it is not incorrect to call these karotypes sexes. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788604210201628892
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 599FF88024806D7C453227392D01029C42ADE06F2B7CBAAE22D94E928F1F473C
  • createdAtMillis - 1715293793561
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788604210201628892599FF88024806D7C453227392D01029C42ADE06F2B7CBAAE22D94E928F1F473C