Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 20:47:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA6669BA905643E17A0E57EE5B0B84B16DDBC09DE9D9BFB67B822B82F3F38F1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. La note ne mentionne que le cout à l'usage, hors la "facture" dont il est question prend aussi en compte le cout d'acquisition et le cout de réparation. Par ailleurs, le propos est sur la pertinence du 100% électrique et non sur la pertinence de l'électrique.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788599492557598900
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA6669BA905643E17A0E57EE5B0B84B16DDBC09DE9D9BFB67B822B82F3F38F1A
  • createdAtMillis - 1715287646605
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788599492557598900DA6669BA905643E17A0E57EE5B0B84B16DDBC09DE9D9BFB67B822B82F3F38F1A