Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 16:30:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E7102C297BEF2C3D0BC3462C1FC1A0ACD97A50BBFD90CC61AE0A2659E216E8B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. La note ne mentionne que le cout à l'usage, hors la "facture" dont il est question prend aussi en compte le cout d'acquisition et le cout de réparation. Par ailleurs, le propos est sur la pertinence du 100% électrique et non sur la pertinence de l'électrique.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788599492557598900
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E7102C297BEF2C3D0BC3462C1FC1A0ACD97A50BBFD90CC61AE0A2659E216E8B
  • createdAtMillis - 1715272236411
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17885994925575989009E7102C297BEF2C3D0BC3462C1FC1A0ACD97A50BBFD90CC61AE0A2659E216E8B