Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 22:45:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BCB75307AC142F527027191426FB7C6E58CD3064FD2A8D65D346B51D47599D5B
Participant Details

Original Note:

no such warning came from Scientific American. Natural News' erroneously imputes to Scientific American the statements of a guest column that appeared in the October 17, 2019, issue of Scientific American. https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/10/fact-check-scientific-american-did-not-warn-that-5g-is-not-safe-it-was-an-op-ed-written-by-a-guest-columnist.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788294275253637543
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BCB75307AC142F527027191426FB7C6E58CD3064FD2A8D65D346B51D47599D5B
  • createdAtMillis - 1715208332413
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788294275253637543BCB75307AC142F527027191426FB7C6E58CD3064FD2A8D65D346B51D47599D5B