Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 02:32:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA7D7055A8D89B26632E26D72433FAD383D68A01D9A521266AB768D9F8D2F48C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misleading quote as proven directly by the link. The point of the ruling is that the full trial, which has not yet reached a conclusion, can continue. If it was considered proven, then the trial would have concluded right there. https://www.icj-cij.org/node/203454

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788289426373878224
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA7D7055A8D89B26632E26D72433FAD383D68A01D9A521266AB768D9F8D2F48C
  • createdAtMillis - 1715221925338
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788289426373878224DA7D7055A8D89B26632E26D72433FAD383D68A01D9A521266AB768D9F8D2F48C