Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 17:43:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9E691D5712923E746636F60AF0DE0A8412E4BD94B50DDB885B1B80DB3DF4A5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is not factually wrong, but also misses the point. CNs should either correct material misstatements or add (directly!) relevant context. This might be true, but it also belongs in a comment or a QT, not a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788252286155718841
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9E691D5712923E746636F60AF0DE0A8412E4BD94B50DDB885B1B80DB3DF4A5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1715190235068
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788252286155718841C9E691D5712923E746636F60AF0DE0A8412E4BD94B50DDB885B1B80DB3DF4A5A