Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 17:40:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D00497150EB01FFBA4DC30E7088167C5333BCA605823FCA02DC8D3CED45BEB62
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le tweet cité par Sandrine Rousseau ne précise pas quel est le produit pulvérisé. Il pourrait s'agir d'engrais ou de produit autorisé en agriculture biologique. L'absence d'EPI du conducteur du tracteur et la distance aux habitations plaide en ce sens. https://landes.chambre-agriculture.fr/environnement/phytosanitaires/zones-de-non-traitement-znt/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1788222019223331224
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D00497150EB01FFBA4DC30E7088167C5333BCA605823FCA02DC8D3CED45BEB62
createdAtMillis - 1715190023314
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1788222019223331224D00497150EB01FFBA4DC30E7088167C5333BCA605823FCA02DC8D3CED45BEB62