Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 16:59:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D3CD4E934B217A5788BAB7F7E8E65514B4CC7F91940BC759437074BC325D616
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le tweet cité par Sandrine Rousseau ne précise pas quel est le produit pulvérisé. Il pourrait s'agir d'engrais ou de produit autorisé en agriculture biologique. L'absence d'EPI du conducteur du tracteur et la distance aux habitations plaide en ce sens. https://landes.chambre-agriculture.fr/environnement/phytosanitaires/zones-de-non-traitement-znt/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1788222019223331224
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5D3CD4E934B217A5788BAB7F7E8E65514B4CC7F91940BC759437074BC325D616
createdAtMillis - 1715187580629
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17882220192233312245D3CD4E934B217A5788BAB7F7E8E65514B4CC7F91940BC759437074BC325D616