Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 21:08:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC305F099885A0BE84C197F49DC728CACFA0D57543D05F11C83D96D930F77809
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source provided by the noter claiming it was never White Phosphorus says that the substance is likely White Phosphorus. Even if it hadn't, it would have nothing to do with the 2023/24 reports of its use seeings how the given article was from 15 years ago, 2009. https://www.wired.com/2009/01/its-still-not-c/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788170078250488249
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC305F099885A0BE84C197F49DC728CACFA0D57543D05F11C83D96D930F77809
  • createdAtMillis - 1715202539427
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788170078250488249EC305F099885A0BE84C197F49DC728CACFA0D57543D05F11C83D96D930F77809