Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 16:33:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D982B5F8DF3DF2B18D66DA896FDD83FFAF7B9B547A05819D18BFD15EE9C2DFA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source provided by the noter claiming it was never White Phosphorus says that the substance is likely White Phosphorus. Even if it hadn't, it would have nothing to do with the 2023/24 reports of its use seeings how the given article was from 15 years ago, 2009. https://www.wired.com/2009/01/its-still-not-c/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788170078250488249
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D982B5F8DF3DF2B18D66DA896FDD83FFAF7B9B547A05819D18BFD15EE9C2DFA8
  • createdAtMillis - 1715186038208
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788170078250488249D982B5F8DF3DF2B18D66DA896FDD83FFAF7B9B547A05819D18BFD15EE9C2DFA8