Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 15:17:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F128C992C0F07BD0EB84C38B85D33B3E07379D1119C49A0A352789225382670A
Participant Details

Original Note:

De reden van terughalen van deze vaccins is niet omdat ze schadelijk zouden zijn, zoals deze post beweert, maar omdat er inmiddels genoeg andere vaccins op de markt zijn die beter beschermen tegen de nieuwe varianten van het Coronavirus. Zie de verklaring van AstraZeneca zelf: https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/may/08/astrazeneca-withdraws-covid-19-vaccine-worldwide-citing-surplus-of-newer-vaccines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788130565201248416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F128C992C0F07BD0EB84C38B85D33B3E07379D1119C49A0A352789225382670A
  • createdAtMillis - 1715181473861
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788130565201248416F128C992C0F07BD0EB84C38B85D33B3E07379D1119C49A0A352789225382670A