Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-19 08:10:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB82D48CC8D59053C7E5AC475497C7FC847CF6719FA673359C00F2535B209A4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

De reden van terughalen van deze vaccins is niet omdat ze schadelijk zouden zijn, zoals deze post beweert, maar omdat er inmiddels genoeg andere vaccins op de markt zijn die beter beschermen tegen de nieuwe varianten van het Coronavirus. Zie de verklaring van AstraZeneca zelf: https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/may/08/astrazeneca-withdraws-covid-19-vaccine-worldwide-citing-surplus-of-newer-vaccines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788130565201248416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB82D48CC8D59053C7E5AC475497C7FC847CF6719FA673359C00F2535B209A4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1716106236904
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788130565201248416DB82D48CC8D59053C7E5AC475497C7FC847CF6719FA673359C00F2535B209A4D