Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 03:51:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B2A08FF42358A7BE6C00B9E65429E57A3EDAEFEEE5AEDB342C94DCEA7C3AD885
Participant Details

Original Note:

De reden van terughalen van deze vaccins is niet omdat ze schadelijk zouden zijn, zoals deze post beweert, maar omdat er inmiddels genoeg andere vaccins op de markt zijn die beter beschermen tegen de nieuwe varianten van het Coronavirus. Zie de verklaring van AstraZeneca zelf: https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/may/08/astrazeneca-withdraws-covid-19-vaccine-worldwide-citing-surplus-of-newer-vaccines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788130565201248416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B2A08FF42358A7BE6C00B9E65429E57A3EDAEFEEE5AEDB342C94DCEA7C3AD885
  • createdAtMillis - 1715226712688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788130565201248416B2A08FF42358A7BE6C00B9E65429E57A3EDAEFEEE5AEDB342C94DCEA7C3AD885