Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 04:28:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 690FBE3FA82FCC44033C9A8B7AF87A652D6BA61B337DC22A96B5DA43D53DD0AF
Participant Details

Original Note:

De reden van terughalen van deze vaccins is niet omdat ze schadelijk zouden zijn, zoals deze post beweert, maar omdat er inmiddels genoeg andere vaccins op de markt zijn die beter beschermen tegen de nieuwe varianten van het Coronavirus. Zie de verklaring van AstraZeneca zelf: https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/may/08/astrazeneca-withdraws-covid-19-vaccine-worldwide-citing-surplus-of-newer-vaccines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788130565201248416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 690FBE3FA82FCC44033C9A8B7AF87A652D6BA61B337DC22A96B5DA43D53DD0AF
  • createdAtMillis - 1715228881704
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1788130565201248416690FBE3FA82FCC44033C9A8B7AF87A652D6BA61B337DC22A96B5DA43D53DD0AF