Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 11:45:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5364B971D2C7D2489550DFCC0DE6CC6083A43531F8C1AD52AD365F5B8B7C2350
Participant Details

Original Note:

De reden van terughalen van deze vaccins is niet omdat ze schadelijk zouden zijn, zoals deze post beweert, maar omdat er inmiddels genoeg andere vaccins op de markt zijn die beter beschermen tegen de nieuwe varianten van het Coronavirus. Zie de verklaring van AstraZeneca zelf: https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/may/08/astrazeneca-withdraws-covid-19-vaccine-worldwide-citing-surplus-of-newer-vaccines

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788130565201248416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5364B971D2C7D2489550DFCC0DE6CC6083A43531F8C1AD52AD365F5B8B7C2350
  • createdAtMillis - 1715168759391
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17881305652012484165364B971D2C7D2489550DFCC0DE6CC6083A43531F8C1AD52AD365F5B8B7C2350