Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 03:58:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F07F30133FFC01A3659867CF4C4EA269E332834A1078EE1B272D80661CD280E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - while I agree that the gag order is constitutional, whether or not this one is constitution is a matter of opinion (unless ruled on by a higher court). OP does not say all gag orders are unconstitutional. Seems like grasping.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788016499296268643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F07F30133FFC01A3659867CF4C4EA269E332834A1078EE1B272D80661CD280E
  • createdAtMillis - 1715140696225
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17880164992962686436F07F30133FFC01A3659867CF4C4EA269E332834A1078EE1B272D80661CD280E