Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-07 23:34:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA84413BDB8D979A32D4E454EEE37B3F0F865E5ABB88565F0513014EC4BDF257
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is technically true, but AstraZeneca's vaccine was not withdrawn *because* of the rare side effect. Although the post says "after," this could be misunderstood as causality. AstraZeneca said it was withdrawn due to low demand, citing the surplus of updated vaccines. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/07/astrazeneca-withdrawing-covid-vaccine/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787966955955064881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EA84413BDB8D979A32D4E454EEE37B3F0F865E5ABB88565F0513014EC4BDF257
  • createdAtMillis - 1715124891108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787966955955064881EA84413BDB8D979A32D4E454EEE37B3F0F865E5ABB88565F0513014EC4BDF257