Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-07 23:54:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FD6C315006BCF38D2261D9A47439ECDA0D05D51DCFFFFC934377B2133B20144
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is technically true, but AstraZeneca's vaccine was not withdrawn *because* of the rare side effect. Although the post says "after," this could be misunderstood as causality. AstraZeneca said it was withdrawn due to low demand, citing the surplus of updated vaccines. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/07/astrazeneca-withdrawing-covid-vaccine/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787966955955064881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FD6C315006BCF38D2261D9A47439ECDA0D05D51DCFFFFC934377B2133B20144
  • createdAtMillis - 1715126044454
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17879669559550648814FD6C315006BCF38D2261D9A47439ECDA0D05D51DCFFFFC934377B2133B20144