Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 22:49:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04799A721D7DC209463476A1A8D551DFADE64745C2A5AC623354AFA616075F0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Titular engañoso. El juez fue acusado ante el Senado por un particular en comparecencia voluntaria, reportando presunta prevaricación e inmoralidad de juez y compañero de juzgado en su propio caso de divorcio, según Diario de Sesiones. Se desconoce la resolución, si la hubo. https://www.congreso.es/public_oficiales/L7/SEN/DS/CO/CS0554.PDF

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787964074434691200
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04799A721D7DC209463476A1A8D551DFADE64745C2A5AC623354AFA616075F0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1715208590428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178796407443469120004799A721D7DC209463476A1A8D551DFADE64745C2A5AC623354AFA616075F0E