Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-07 22:37:04 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB54320E6A7595FC27667451766751E548F319B2A561A78BEAF71415C00AD552
Participant Details

Original Note:

Si bien el titular es técnicamente correcto, conviene aclarar que fue un particular que compareció a petición propia en una comisión del Senado quien acusó al juez de prevaricar. No fue el Senado quien lo acusó. Fuente: el propio artículo. https://twitter.com/El_Plural/status/1787743966118437334

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787944999025357017
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB54320E6A7595FC27667451766751E548F319B2A561A78BEAF71415C00AD552
  • createdAtMillis - 1715121424200
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787944999025357017AB54320E6A7595FC27667451766751E548F319B2A561A78BEAF71415C00AD552