Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 06:32:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CEF245840B2F2B574A368D6DE96B9BC2900ED1467CCE040BC529008CC8C7D96
Participant Details

Original Note:

Si bien el titular es técnicamente correcto, conviene aclarar que fue un particular que compareció a petición propia en una comisión del Senado quien acusó al juez de prevaricar. No fue el Senado quien lo acusó. Fuente: el propio artículo. https://twitter.com/El_Plural/status/1787743966118437334

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787944999025357017
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CEF245840B2F2B574A368D6DE96B9BC2900ED1467CCE040BC529008CC8C7D96
  • createdAtMillis - 1715149951209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17879449990253570174CEF245840B2F2B574A368D6DE96B9BC2900ED1467CCE040BC529008CC8C7D96