Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-07 22:00:27 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D774429D2CEC951C98BA8F800433054C12633D3F333CD6334596A23BC679350
Participant Details

Original Note:

Si bien el titular es técnicamente correcto, conviene aclarar que fue un particular que compareció a petición propia en una comisión del Senado quien acusó al juez de prevaricar. No fue el Senado quien lo acusó. Fuente: el propio artículo. https://twitter.com/El_Plural/status/1787743966118437334

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787944999025357017
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D774429D2CEC951C98BA8F800433054C12633D3F333CD6334596A23BC679350
  • createdAtMillis - 1715119227020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17879449990253570173D774429D2CEC951C98BA8F800433054C12633D3F333CD6334596A23BC679350